3. After a night of passion, a man gave his girlfriend a deed to a parcel of land he owned in a nearby resort. The girlfriend thanked the man in a very sarcastic tone of voice and left the paper on his dresser. Assuming she had refused the gift, the man offered the land to his spiritual guide. When the guide saw the deed with his name on it, he explained that his religious order required that all property be held in common. The man said he would have the grantee's name changed, but he then died intestate shortly thereafter. As the man's attorney was preparing paperwork to transfer the land to the man's only heirhis second cousin, twice removedthe girlfriend came forward and said that she was the owner of the land. She said she had only left the deed with the man for safekeeping. The spiritual guide also claimed that he had not refused the property. He had only meant the title had to be in the name of his religious order, not his own. The attorney filed an action in the probate court asking for a declaratory judgment regarding title to the land. What is the mostly likely response from the court?

Question 3 options:

a)	The spiritual guide's religious order is entitled to the land.

b)	The spiritual guide is entitled to the land.

c)	The girlfriend is entitled to the land.

d)	The second cousin, twice removed, is entitled to the land.