3. Analysis of an expansion project Companies invest in expansion projects with the expectation of increasing the earnings of its business. Consider the case of Yeatman Co.: Yeatman Co. is considering an investment that will have the following sales, variable costs, and fixed operating costs: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Unit sales 3,000 $17.25 3,250 $17.33 3,300 $17.45 3,400 $18.24 Sales price $8.88 $8.92 $9.03 $9.06 Variable cost per unit Fixed operating costs except depreciation Accelerated depreciation rate $12,500 $13,000 $13,220 $13,250 33% 45% 15% 7% This project will require an investment of $15,000 in new equipment. The equipment will have no salvage value at the end of the project's four-year life. Yeatman pays a constant tax rate of 40%, and it has a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 11%. Determine what the project's net present value (NPV) would be when using accelerated depreciation. Determine what the project's net present value (NPV) would be when using accelerated depreciation. O $15,476 O $20,634 0 $17,195 O $19,774 Now determine what the project's NPV would be when using straight-line depreciation. Using the depreciation method will result in the highest NPV for the project. No other firm would take on this project if Yeatman turns it down. How much should Yeatman reduce the NPV of this project if it discovered that this project would reduce one of its division's net after-tax cash flows by $300 for each year of the four-year project? $698 $931 $1,024 $791 Yeatman spent $2,500 on a marketing study to estimate the number of units that it can sell each year. What should Yeatman do to take this information into account? The company does not need to do anything with the cost of the marketing study because the marketing study is a sunk cost. Increase the NPV of the project $2,500. Increase the amount of the initial investment by $2,500