3. Post a response to the following questions: CASE IN POINT A landowner and farmer entered into a sharecrop agreement whereby the farmer would farm the land provided it was free of weeds. The landowner, although not a farmer, represented the land to be free of weeds, in the presence of witnesses. The farmer seeded the land, but once things began to grow, discovered the land to be so weedy that he had to abandon his crop. The landowner sued for the first year's rent and damages. The farmer counterclaimed that the landowner had misrepresented the land and claimed for the expenses of seeding the land. The court held that the landowner had innocently misrepresented the land as weed-free, and dismissed the landowner's claim. Koolman &. Nichols ( 1991), 75 Man. R. (2d) 298. Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? Explain with your reasons4. Post a response to the following questions: CASE IN POINT A transportation company leased a special type of flatbed trailer to haul an 80-ton transformer from Montreal to St. John's. Newfoundland. The leasing company agreed to supply the trailer and personnel to supervise the loading of the trailer on board a ship in Montreal. At the ship. the parties discovered that the clearance of the trailer would not allow the trailer to pass over a hump in the loading ramp, and it could not be loaded on the ship. The transportation company demanded return of the rental price paid. The court held that the contract had been frustrated and ordered the return of most of the rental paid. Summers Transport Lid. v. G.M. South Lad. 1990 CanLII 7162 (NL SC) . Do you agree or disagree with the court's decision? Explain with your reasons\f1. Post a response to the following questions: - Explain the significance of the dutf to consult and accommodate to husines Explain with 1.I'our reasons 2. Post a response to the following questions: Recent proposals have brought the notion of including religious-based legal systems. such as lslsrnle sharia lawl or social systems of Indigenous law. into the structure of the Canadian legal system. At one end ofthe spectrum. some believe this can be purely a matter of agreement between persons who consent to the application of alternative legal systems... and at the other end are those 1who believe that onlyr one system should exist. open and applicable to all. Is there room lbr this him! ofehoice in mullleulture] Canada. or is this a slippery slope toward an unworkable system? - ls there room for this kind of choice in multicultural Canada, or is this a sii|::Iper'.II slope toward an unworkable system? Explain with your reasons