3. Recently, Plaintiff, a citizen of California, found an ad for a new Mazda at a very good price. The ad was placed in the Reno Gazette, published in Reno, Nevada. Defendant (a Reno Mazda dealer) is a Nevada corporation. It placed the ad in --CONTINUE EXAM ON NEXT PAGE 6 the paper, fully aware that many northern Californians read the Reno Gazette. In fact, Plaintiff found the paper in her local library in northern California. Plaintiff called Defendant and negotiated the price, which included having Defendant get the car registered in California and delivered to Plaintiff in California. Plaintiff was seriously injured in a car accident. Plaintiff has sued Defendant for products liability in a California state court. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Which of the following statements is most accurate? A. Plaintiff would have been better off filing in federal court in California because its jurisdictional reach is longer than the reach of state courts. B. The court will most likely grant the motion because Defendant's contacts with the forum state are inadequate to satisfy Due Process. C. The court will most likely deny the motion because the contacts with the forum state are sufficient to satisfy Due Process. D. The court will most likely deny the motion because Reno is so close to northern California that Defendant cannot claim any significant burden in responding to the suit in California