3. Same parties. The jewelry is later found in D's possession. D claims that C returned the jewelry after he paid. His obligation and, therefore, both his obligation and the pledge are extinguished. C disputes D's allegations. Decide. C has no right to dispute D's allegations. According to Article 2110, par. 2, \"If subsequent to the perfection of the pledge, the thing is in the possession of the pledgor or owner, there is a prima facie presumption that the same has been returned by the pledgee..." Pledge may extinguished directly as return by the pledgee of the thing pledged to the pledgor or owner, any stipulation that the pledge is not extinguished by the return of the thing is void. And in this case, prima facie presumption that the pledgee returned the thing pledged found in the possession of the pledgor or owner