3.1.1. Requirements Begin the first paragraph here. Begin the second paragraph here. 3.1.2. Technologies and methods Begin the first paragraph here. Begin the second paragraph here. 3.1.3. Conceptualization Begin the first paragraph here. Begin the second paragraph here. 3.1.4. Physical architecture Begin the first paragraph here. Begin the second paragraph here. 3.1.5. Materialization Begin the first paragraph here. Begin the second paragraph here. 3.1.6. Evaluation Begin the first paragraph here. Begin the second paragraph here. answer these questions according to this project "answer these questions according to this project 1.2.1. NIOSH RWL Application Manual Limitations The existing dependence on manual procedures for implementing the NIOSH Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) presents significant obstacles. The potential complexities include manually computing multiplier values, estimating the RWL, interpreting Load Index (LI) numbers, and estimating physiological and biomechanical factors. These inaccuracies not only endanger the quality of ergonomic evaluations, but they also contribute to inconsistencies among assessors. Additionally RWL calculations might not perfectly fit all workplace scenarios due to the diversity of tasks, environments, and individual differences among workers. Tasks and conditions in many industrial settings often change, making it challenging to consistently apply a static RWL to varying situations. Also Properly training personnel to use and interpret RWL values accurately requires expertise and continuous education, which might not always be readily available. 1.2.2. Lack of User-Friendly Tools for Education The lack of a specific software solution adds to the difficulties in teaching and understanding ergonomic concepts. Currently, there is a dearth of an easy platform that allows students to enter task settings, display the related variables, and comprehend the significance of LI values. This lack of user-friendly equipment impedes the efficient delivery of instructional information, decreasing the efficacy of Work Study and Ergonomics programs. 1.2.3 Inadequate documentation and analysis The manual technique to NIOSH RWL application falls short in terms of providing complete documentation and ergonomic assessment analysis. The lack of a simple reporting method makes it difficult to assess progress, hampered by the iterative nature of ergonomic changes. This shortcoming represents a significant impediment to maintaining a continual cycle of learning and improvement within the academic setting. 1.2.4 Industry Requirement for Technologically Qualified Graduates In a continuously changing labor environment, graduates with practical abilities in implementing ergonomic approaches employing current technologies are in high demand. The present manual method to NIOSH RWL does not meet industry requirements for software tool competency. This misalignment creates a chasm between academic preparation and industrial expectations, stressing the importance of an innovative solution such as the C-NIOSH-RWL system.