3.Which is the best issue statement regarding the part-time employees' concerns in the Hornick case? (CASE: Hornick v. Borough of Duryea. 507 F. Supp. 1091 (1980))

a.Whether part-time workers who are hired, controlled, and paid by a company are counted as one of a company's 15 employees under Title VII, even though they work only a few hours a day. b.Whether the defendant had at least 15 employees so as to be considered an employer for Title VII purposes. Subissue: Whether part-time workers were to be counted as employees in determining if a person is an employer under Title VII. c.Whether the plaintiff was discriminated against solely because of her sex, based on a height and weight requirement, according to the theory of disparate treatment and disparate impact. d.Whether part-time workers who work only a few hours a day are considered employees for Title VII purposes.