4 4) In Hadley v. Baxendale , when Hadley sued because Baxendale took unnecessary time to get a crankshaftrepaired , causing Hadley's mill to close for an extended time , the court found :"A ) Baxendale owed Hadley compensatory damages because the mill was shut down for an extended time*directly as a result of Baxendale's delayed delivery .*B ) Baxendale owed Hadley consequential damages because the mill was shut down for an extended time as aresult of Baxendale's delayed delivery and the shutdown was a foreseeable indirect result of Baxendale's delay .( ) Baxendale did not owe Hadley consequential damages because the extended closing time was notforeseeable despite Baxendale's delay in delivery .D ) Baxendale did not owe Hadley either compensatory or consequential damages but did owe punitive damagesdue to the unreasonable delay in delivery .