4 Con Body A A % Fon Paste B 1 Ili 10 Conditional Formatting Format as Table Cell Styles Number Cells Editing Ideas Sessit B14 in B C D E swingink F G H K arty S 1 KPIs and Index numbers ty 2-Jan 2 3 Demand Supply Revenue Occupancy ADR 2-Jan RevPAR lan 4 Sept 2010 3000 196980 67% 98 65.66 2-Jan Subject Oct 2300 3100 2.Jan 246310 74% 107.0913 79.45484 6 Property Noy 2850 3000 338560 95% 118.793 112.8533 7 Dec 3004 3100 365020 97% 121.5113 117.7484 owing des 8 property Competitive atstanding ex for occ 9 Set Nov 2920 3000 340220 97% 116.5137 113.4067 property 10 owing inf 11 Index Numbers ly Der 3.100 12 2.800 13 Question: Compared with the industrial competitive set, how did subject property perform? Support your argument with analyses above, 3.100 3,000 14 3,100 15 5.105 16 lewing del 17 is 3,070 18 Beti 19 20 Sheet1 + Ready 6 stv A w SVG $ & 5 6 8 9 P E R Y T F G 6 H 4 Con Body A A % Fon Paste B 1 Ili 10 Conditional Formatting Format as Table Cell Styles Number Cells Editing Ideas Sessit B14 in B C D E swingink F G H K arty S 1 KPIs and Index numbers ty 2-Jan 2 3 Demand Supply Revenue Occupancy ADR 2-Jan RevPAR lan 4 Sept 2010 3000 196980 67% 98 65.66 2-Jan Subject Oct 2300 3100 2.Jan 246310 74% 107.0913 79.45484 6 Property Noy 2850 3000 338560 95% 118.793 112.8533 7 Dec 3004 3100 365020 97% 121.5113 117.7484 owing des 8 property Competitive atstanding ex for occ 9 Set Nov 2920 3000 340220 97% 116.5137 113.4067 property 10 owing inf 11 Index Numbers ly Der 3.100 12 2.800 13 Question: Compared with the industrial competitive set, how did subject property perform? Support your argument with analyses above, 3.100 3,000 14 3,100 15 5.105 16 lewing del 17 is 3,070 18 Beti 19 20 Sheet1 + Ready 6 stv A w SVG $ & 5 6 8 9 P E R Y T F G 6 H