4. Craig has applied for a foreman position in the factory of AMPCO. Craig has a history of having had Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a mental condition with a bad reaction to bright lights and loud noises. After three years of treatment, the PTSD doesn't bother him anymore. It comes up in his interview, however, because he missed a bunch of work time and lost another factory job because of the PTSD when it was at its worst. The hiring manager doesn't want to hire Craig because he feels that it might happen again, and factories are notoriously bright and loud. The hiring manager argues that Craig isn't covered under the ADA and that he hasn't requested an accommodation, so the ADA shouldn't apply here. Is that a valid legal analysis? a. It is true that Craig isn't covered under the ADA because his PTSD isn't substantially limiting him at this time b. It is true that Craig isn't covered under the ADA because he hasn't requested an accommodation c. It is true that Craig isn't covered under the ADA because there hasn't been the start of an employment relationship yet with AMPCO d. It is true that Craig isn't covered under the ADA because PTSD is a mental condition and not a physical condition and thus does not require accommodation e. None of the above are true; Craig is covered under the ADA