4. Frances and Kyle are both 14 years old and ready to go out on their first date. Both are extremely hungry and they decide to go to the fanciest restaurant in town. After being seated. they order a seven-course meal without noticing the cost on the menu. After dining on the elegantly served food, they are presented with a $400 bill. Between them, the children have $60. which they give to the restaurant. The restaurant owner agrees to let them go if they promise to return and either (1) pay the remainder or (2) work to pay down the rest of the bill. Frances and Kyle agree to these terms. Later. the children try to use the incapacity defense to disaffirm the contract for the meal and the subsequent agreement to work off the unpaid balance. They also seek a return of the $60. Can the minors use the classic common law incapacity defense to void the contract and get their $60 back? Explain your reasoning. Consider the policy goals of the incapacity defense in formulating your