Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
4. (Lehr #6.10) Shockingly Bad Timing (Loewenstein 1987). Consider the timing of a future bad outcome (v < 0), like receiving a non-lethal, but
4. (Lehr #6.10) Shockingly Bad Timing (Loewenstein 1987). Consider the timing of a future bad outcome (v < 0), like receiving a non-lethal, but strong electric shock. Figure 6.6 shows two possible plots of U(T, v), as given by equation (6.8). T A U(T, v): = +8+ - A Total Discounted Utility, U(T,v) 3 6 9 D C Periods Outcome is Delayed, T 12 Figure 6.6 Anticipatory Utility of a Bad in Exercise 6.10 a. Consider the two curves. i. If U(T, v) looks like curve C, when is the optimal time T to receive the shock? If U(T, v) looks like curve D, when is the optimal time T to receive the shock? ii. 15 (6.8) b. Now suppose you must receive the shock by period 9 at the latest. Re-answer the two questions from part (a) given this constraint. c. Observe that U(T, v) looks like curve C if and only if U(1, v) < U(0, v). i. Apply equation (6.8) to this inequality to derive a bound on A for which U(T, v) looks like curve C. ii. Provide intuition for the connection between this condition and your results in parts (a) and (b).
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started