Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

4 . Page 3 In the case United States V . Lopez , why did the U .S. Supreme Court reverse the criminal conviction of

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
4 . Page 3 In the case United States V . Lopez , why did the U .S. Supreme Court reverse the criminal conviction of Mr. Lopez ?! .` Because Congress exceeded its authority in passing the criminal statute " Gun - Free* School Zones Act . "` _Because the government tried him under both state law and federal law and that was unlawful double jeopardy . C. Because the conduct of Mr. Lopez did not involve interstate commerce* D. Because the Supremacy Clause superseded the" Gun - Free School Zones Act . " E. Both A and C The three branches of government in the United States are* A. the executive , legislative , and administrative branches . B. the administrative , executive , and statutory branches . C. the legislative , executive , and judicial branches . D. the administrative , legislative , and international branches 6 . In the situation with Jerry Seinfeld and his friends described in the textbook and in class . being robbed ? why did the police officer arrest them when they did nothing to help the person they watched A . Because they refused to answer the questions of the police officer who wanted to know what they witnessed . B . Because Seinfeld and his friends had no liability since bystanders will never have a duty to help those that are being injured or attacked . C . Because the victim that was robbed filed a civil suit against Seinfeld and his friends , and there was an outstanding warrant for their arrest . D. Because a new criminal statute was recently enacted requiring bystanders to help anyone in danger , and Seinfeld and friends did nothing to help the victim .11 . Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding appellate courts ? A. Appellate courts often hear new evidence and testimony . B . Appellate courts generally accept the factual findings of the trial court . C. Only the federal court system has appellate courts . D. Appellate courts hear only criminal cases . 12 . The federal judicial branch of the U. S. government* A. interprets statutes . _creates administrative agencies . C . enacts statutes . D. issues Executive Orders . E. None of the above . For the first time , 13 . Which of the following is a true statement with regard to the ruling in Marbury v. Madison ? A. the Supreme Court created the doctrine of " long - arm " jurisdiction . B. the Supreme Court established the principle of " judicial review , " and held that the Supreme Court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution . C. the Supreme Court recognized the power of Congress to create legislation involving* interstate commerce under the Constitution . D. the Supreme Court created the doctrine of " due process of law" by granting the writ of mandamus Marbury requested from the Court , thereby enabling him to receive his Commission and be appointed justice of the peace .14 . In the U. S. Supreme Court case National Federation of Independent Business V. Sebelius , the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was A. upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court as constitutional because requiring individuals to buy insurance can be viewed as a tax , and Congress has power under the Taxing Clause to impose taxes . B. held entirely unconstitutional and void because the Commerce Clause does not allow Congress to force citizens into interstate commerce by directing them to buy health insurance . C. upheld as constitutional because receiving health care is protected as an individual right under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution . * D. held entirely unconstitutional by the U . S. Supreme Court because the costs to the American public would exceed the health care benefits received by only a portion of the country's citizens . 15 . Defendant Dennis is served with pleadings by a process server . One document informs* Dennis that he is being sued in civil court by Plaintiff Patti who claims that Dennis negligently caused an auto crash which caused her serious injuries and lost income and he owes her money damages . The other document further directs Dennis to respond to Palli's claims against him . What are the pleadings served upon Defendant Dennis called ? A . A criminal complaint and writ of mandamus B. A " Lawsuit Initiation Form " and" Request to Reply " C. A civil complaint and summons D. An order and demand from the State Legislature to file informational records with the proceed to trial Legislative Bureau , an administrative agency that will decide if Patti's claims should 16 . Defendant Dennis wants to know what Plaintiff Patti is going to say at trial , and how Patti has computed her claimed damages of lost income . Which of the following discovery method ( s ) last income ?" may Dennis use to find out what Patti will testify to at trial and how she computed her claimed A. A deposition B. Written interrogatories C. A writ of mandamus D. A motion to the court for summary judgment E. Both A and B17 - 19 . The following three questions are based on the case International Shoe Co . v. State of Washington (International Shoe ) . As you will recall , although International Shoe manufactured footwear and had offices and warehouses only in ST . Louis , Missouri , it sold its products nationwide , including in the State of Washington . When the State of Washington sought to impose a tax in the form of contributions to the state's unemployment fund , International Shoe refused to pay , arguing that it was not engaged in business in Washington . 17 . What was the main issue of the International Shoe case before the United States Supreme* Court ? A . Did International Shoe discriminate against it's employees working only in Washington by paying them lower wages then its employees in Missouri ?* B . Did International Shoe have sufficient minimum contacts in the State of Washington* to permit the Washington Courts to have jurisdiction there ?" C . Did International Shoe wrongfully use imported products and sweatshop labor from foreign countries to manufacture shoes in the State of Washington , thereby violating the Commerce Clause and the Bill of Rights ?! 18 . In the International Shoe case , the U. S. Supreme Court :" A. ruled in favor of the State of Washington and decided that it may maintain its suit to collect the tax from International Shoe . B. ruled that this was a decision that needed to be left to Missouri and Washington courts due to the separation of powers and sent it back to both state courts for a final decision . C. ruled in favor of International Shoe because it proved in a U.S. Supreme Court trial other countries . that it was not selling shoes made with inferior products and with sweatshop labor from 19 . The International Shoe case is important because it ! A. establishes the right for the states to have exclusive jurisdiction over businesses that manufacture goods within their boundaries . B. establishes that businesses can engage in manufacturing and hire employees in Countries other than the United States . C. is an example of long - arm jurisdiction and establishes that minimum contacts with the forum state can enable a court in that state to exert personal jurisdiction over a party consistent with the Due Process clause of the Constitution

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Applied Regression Analysis And Other Multivariable Methods

Authors: David G. Kleinbaum, Lawrence L. Kupper, Azhar Nizam, Eli S. Rosenberg

5th Edition

1285051084, 978-1285963754, 128596375X, 978-1285051086

Students also viewed these Law questions