46 - 50 years old 3 10.7 10.7 96.4 Above 50 1 3.6 3.6 100.0 Total 28 100.0 100.0 1.3. Civil status Civil Status Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Single 13 46.4 46.4 46.4 Married 14 50.0 50.0 96 4 Separated 3.6 3.6 100.0 Total 28 100,0 100.0 1.4. Highest Educational Attainment Highest Educational Attainment Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Master's Level 28 100.0 100.0 100.0 1.5. Salary Grade Salary Grade Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 5G 1 - 5G4 1 3.6 3.6 3.6 SG 5- SG B 3 10.7 10.7 14.3 SG 9 - SG 12 6 21.4 214 35.7 SG 13 - SG 16 16 57.1 57.1 92.9 SG 17 and Above 2 7.1 7.1 100.0 Total 28 100.0 100,0 1.6. Status of Appointment Status of Appointment Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent 2L Valid Permanent 28 100.0 100.0 100 0 1.7. Length of Service Length of Service Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 2 -7 years 18 14.3 $4.3 64.3 8 - 12 years 5 17.9 17.9 82.1 13 - 17 years 2 7.1 7,1 89.3 23 - 27 years 7.1 7.1 96.4 28 years and above 1 3.6 3,6 100.0 Total 26 100.0 100.0 2. What is the assessment of the respondents on the level of job satisfaction in terms of: 2.1. Achievement 2.2. Work Itself 2.3. Recognition 2.4. Salary Statistics Achievement Work Recognition Salary Mean 4.2024 4 1786 3.5119 3.2738 3. Is there a significant difference on the assessment of the respondents on the level of job satisfaction in terms of the abovementioned variables when they are grouped according to profile? Sig - 0.181 p value do not reject null, approximately normal Use parametric - independent t-test or anova Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov" Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Sig Statistic JobSatisfactio .140 28 170 948 28 181 a. Lilliefors Significance CorrectionIndependent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances Sig Sig JobSatisfaction Equal variances assumed 403 531 1.150 26 Equal variances not assumed 950 5.024 Group Statistics Sid. Error Sex N Mear Sid. Deviation Mean JobSatisfactio Malo 5 4.0500 LZB69 31247 Female 23 3 7355 52383 10923 ANOVA Civil Status JobSalisfaction Sum of Squares dif Mean Square F Sin Between Groups 306 2 153 473 629 Within Groups 8.090 25 .324 Total 8.396 27 t value is sig ANOVA Age JobSatisfaction Sum of Squares dif Mean Square Sig Between Groups 4,389 6 732 3,834 .010 Within Groups 4.007 21 .191 Total B.396 27 Highest Educational Attainment and Status of Appointment cannot be determined due to one variable onlyL ANOVA Salary Grade JobSatisfaction Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sin Between Groups 1,388 4 347 1.139 363 Within Groups 7.008 23 305 Total B.396 27 ANOVA Length of Service JobSatisfaction Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig Between Groups 1.288 4 322 1.042 407 Within Groups 7.107 23 309 Total 8.396 27 4. Is there a significant relationship between job satisfaction and the following variables: 4.1. Salary grade Correlations JobSatisfacti on SalaryGrade1 JobSatisfactio Pearson Correlation 1 105 Sig (2-tailed) 595 N 28 28 SalaryGrade 1 Pearson Correlation 105 Sig. (2-tailed) 595 N 28 28 105 - r .595 p value 4.2 Status of Appointment Cannot be determined 5L 4.3. Length of Service 5. Correlations JobSatisfacti LengthOfServi on Gel JobSatisfaction Pearson Correlation 1 135 Sig (2-tailed) .494 N 28 28 LengthOfService 1 Pearson Correlation .135 Sig. (2-tailed) 494 N 28 28 6. B. Hypothesis III. Methods IV. Results Tables/Graphs & Analysis V. Conclusion References: Judge, T. A., Hulin, C. L., & Dalal, R. S. (2012). Job satisfaction and job affect. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 496-525). Oxford University Press. Raziq, A. and Maulabakhsh. 2015. Impact of Working on Job Satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 23 (2015) 717 725. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spector, Paul E. 1997. Job Satisfaction: Applications, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage Publications, Inc. 2455 Teller Road, Thousands Oaks. California. 91320. Tietjen, M.A. and Myers, R.M. (1998), "Motivation and job satisfaction", Management Decision, Vol. 36 No. 4, PP 226