5. Connor owns and runs a manufacturing business headquartered and incorporated in California that makes hiking boots. Connor's business sells the hiking boots it manufactures to hikers who live in California and in Nevada. Six months ago, Nicholas, a Nevada hiker, purchased a pair of hiking boots from Connor's business and wore them while hiking in a Nevada state park. While Nicholas was hiking wearing the boots, he fell and injured both of his ankles in the fall. Nicholas was unable to walk immediately after the fall, and he used his cell phone to call for medical assistance. A helicopter ambulance evacuated Nicholas to a local hospital in Nevada where he received treatment for his injuries. He has since fully recovered. The combined hospital and helicopter ambulance bill totaled $50,000. Nicholas believes that the hiking boots that he purchased from Connor's business and that he was wearing at the time of his fall were poorly made and that the hiking boots were the cause of his fall and his injuries. If Nicholas makes a claim against Connor's business to recover for his hospital and helicopter ambulance bill, which of the following statements is true?

Group of answer choices

Nicholas can make a claim against Connor's business only in Federal court

Nicholas can make a claim against Connor's business (i) in Nevada state court, or (ii) in California state court, but not (iii) in Federal court

Nicholas can make a claim against Connor's business only in California state court

Nicholas can make a claim against Connor's business only in Nevada state court

Nicholas can make a claim against Connor's business (i) in Nevada state court, or (ii) in California state court, or (iii) in Federal court