5 t1 pointJ In class. we discussed the case brought by an activist against Nike relating to Nike's PR campaign regarding its manufacturing methods overseas. In that case. Nike defended itself by arguing that it did not abuse workers overseas. Nike's key position was... 0 1] That its overseas activity is not subject to U.5. jurisdiction. 0 2] that its PR campaign was "commercial speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. 0 3] that its PR campaign was "public advocacy" or "political speech\" rather than advertising. and therefore Nike could not be in violation oflaws prohibiting false advertising. Question 6 {1 point] You want to use social media to build your brands reputation and decide to offer a contest to do so. You agree to give a top prize of$100.000 to the person that posts the best video to YouTube of "why they love your product so much better than the competitors." The contest is very popular and many people submit hilarious and informative videos. Some of the videos submitted. however, defame the competition with false statements about the competitor's products as well as misleading and false statements about the virtues of your products. One of your competitors sues you. Choose the best analysis. 0 1] Individuals have a right to free speech and can make exaggerated and even false statements about a product and your company can be shielded by that exemption. O 2] Your company cannot be sued for speech it did not make. but in this case your company's solicitation of the videos potentially makes your company liable. O 3] Individuals have a right to free speech but can be sued for false statements under tort law but in no case can you be sued for speech made by others. 0 4] Your company is liable for any false statements made in the consumer videos. Question 3' {1 point] Which of the following is most likely commercial speech? 0 1] "Religion makes a life worth living." 0 2] "Life is better when you relax with Teva Brand Tea.\" 0 3] "Eat more vegetables. they will make you strong."