5. YOLO Company, a paint manufacturer, has select four alternatives sites for constructing their new factory, Paint production processes requires large quantities of water, therefore each alternative site should at least provide 80.000 tons of water.pst month. All four sites have well; their capacities are given in the following table. Another critical factor for site selection is the cost of land. The company can pay at most $2.5 million for purchasing land for the facility. All annual costs for production inputs (raw materials. energy, etc.) are the same except for annual labor, distribution, taxes and some other expenses which are given below. Site A B D Well Capacity (ton/month) 95.000 78,000 83,000 100,000 Land Cost 2.2 2.15 2.6 2.5 Labor 1.62 1.40 1.75 1.45 Costs (million) Distribution Taxes 1.08 0.25 1.75 0.30 1.90 0.40 1.45 0.35 Other 0.95 0.45 0.05 0.50 The key subjective factors in the selection of a site have been identified as (1) housing. (2) education, and (3) community attitudes (CA). A special group assigned to select a site responded to paired comparisons as follows: 1. Education (1) versus housing (2): education is more important than housing, Education and CA both judged equally important. Community attitudes is more important Housing After completing pairwise comparisons for each subjective factor with respect to sites, except following all other comparisons are concluded with equality We observe that site B is better than A in housing and education factors but worst in community attitude. Bis better than and Din education and community attitude. A is better than in housing and community attitude also better than in education attitude. Dis worst than in housing According to the Brown-Gibson approach, which site should be selected if the weight of subjective factors is 0.67 (35 points) 5. YOLO Company, a paint manufacturer, has select four alternatives sites for constructing their new factory, Paint production processes requires large quantities of water, therefore each alternative site should at least provide 80.000 tons of water.pst month. All four sites have well; their capacities are given in the following table. Another critical factor for site selection is the cost of land. The company can pay at most $2.5 million for purchasing land for the facility. All annual costs for production inputs (raw materials. energy, etc.) are the same except for annual labor, distribution, taxes and some other expenses which are given below. Site A B D Well Capacity (ton/month) 95.000 78,000 83,000 100,000 Land Cost 2.2 2.15 2.6 2.5 Labor 1.62 1.40 1.75 1.45 Costs (million) Distribution Taxes 1.08 0.25 1.75 0.30 1.90 0.40 1.45 0.35 Other 0.95 0.45 0.05 0.50 The key subjective factors in the selection of a site have been identified as (1) housing. (2) education, and (3) community attitudes (CA). A special group assigned to select a site responded to paired comparisons as follows: 1. Education (1) versus housing (2): education is more important than housing, Education and CA both judged equally important. Community attitudes is more important Housing After completing pairwise comparisons for each subjective factor with respect to sites, except following all other comparisons are concluded with equality We observe that site B is better than A in housing and education factors but worst in community attitude. Bis better than and Din education and community attitude. A is better than in housing and community attitude also better than in education attitude. Dis worst than in housing According to the Brown-Gibson approach, which site should be selected if the weight of subjective factors is 0.67 (35 points)