6. On October 18, the compary issued cheque a 1181 for $946 to Heims Ca, on account. The chimin which cle wed the hatk in October, was incorrectly fournalized and posted tiv Oriole Company for \$403. 7. A revicwof the barkicstatement resealed thst Oriole Company received electronic pavments frem cuskamers on accourt of $1.874 in October. The bark had asso credited the account with $24 of interest reverue on 0ctober-31. Oriate had o0 previous notice of these innounts Compary by the bank 9. On October 31. the barkstatement showed an NSF charge of $804 for a checue isued by W. Hoad, acustomer, fo Oriole. to the customer. Current Attempt in Progreis \$10, 154. A comparison of the statensent whithe Ciah wecrint reveded the followirs 1. Thestarement incladed debit mesnos of $34 for tho printing of adiditical comosn chenom and 520 for bank service cluarges. 2. Cash sales of $639 on October 12 were deposited in the bank. Thejouz rial eninv to necofd the crihreceot and the depols slip Were incorrectly nude out and recorded tw Oriofe as. $963. The bank de teced the error on the deposit shp and cred trit Driole Compain for the correct anount. 3. The September 30 deposit of 5984 was inckided on the Bctober than eateonest. The deposit thad bein alaced in the bank' night depatit vale on september 30 . A. The October $1 deposit of $959 was not includind an the October bank staterients the deporat had been placed in the barkes night depost vaul an October 31 . 5. Cheques it 1006 for $414 and a 1072 for 5974 were outstandingon sentember $0. of these, 41072 cleared the bink in. bank by Cetober 31 . in Octaber, was incorrectly joumalized and pested by Orioke Comburnfor $463. 7. A review af the bankstatement ceveafed that Oride Comparverecived electrohic puymentsfrom custorsers an account of 23C Santr