6. Steven J. Trzaska was the head of L'oreal USA's regional patent team, managing the procedure by which the company patented products. As an attorney barred in Pennsylvania, Trzaska had to adhere to professional rules of conduct established by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in addition to rules promulgated by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In 2014, L'oreal S.A, the French parent of company of L'Oreal USA, enacted a global quota of patent applications each regional office had to file each year. Employees were informed that failure to meet the quota would negatively impact their careers and even their continued employment at L'oreal. Meanwhile, L'oreal USA simultaneously enacted a rule to increase the quality of patent applications filled with the USPTO. The second rule led to a decrease in number of patents that could be filed with the USPTO, Trzaska's team would not be able to fulfill the patent quota. Faced with the problem, Trzaska informed management that his team would not file patents that they did not believe in good faith were patentable. Several weeks after Trzaska's meeting with the management, he was offered two severance packages that he did not accept. Page 33 Finally, Trzaska was let go. Trzaska subsequently sued L'oreal, alleging that he was fired for his refusal to violate ethical rules that regulate the legal profession. Which stakeholders did Trzaska and the management of L'oreal cater to? Referring back to Exhibit 2-5, what values did L'oreal's management choose when they made the decision to fire Trzaska? [Trzaska v. L'OREAL USA, INC., 865 F. 3d 155 (2017) ]