6.Outdoor Technologies (an Australian company) was involved in a contract dispute with Silver Star Limited (a Chinese company).Outdoor prevailed in the litigation in the Australian courts and obtained a judgment for $500,000.00 against Silver Star (a Chinese company) from the Australian courts.Silver Star owned property in Iowa, so Outdoor filed suit in Iowa to enforce and collect the Australian judgment.Which of the following statements is true?(A) Outdoor cannot collect in the United States a judgment that was issued by an Australian court.(B) Outdoor cannot collect in the United States because Silver Star is not an American company.(C) Outdoor can collect in the United States if the proceeding in the Australian courts was fair and proper.(D) Outdoor can collect in the United States, because both the United States and Australia have common law systems.

Answer:______Explanation:

7.For which of the following activities can a foreign sovereign be sued in an American court?(A) Operating a factory dangerously; (B) Issuing a law that discriminates against a certain group of people; (C) Suspending the civil rights of its people; (D) None of the above

Answer:______Explanation:

8.Grunnings, an American manufacturer of drills and drilling equipment, has been asked to provide construction equipment to a foreign government.The contract is for a sizable amount of money, so Grunnings wants to protect itself if the foreign government refuses to pay for the equipment once it has been delivered.What should Grunnings require in its contract with the foreign government if it wants to protect its right to sue the government if the government does not pay for the goods?(A) a release of sovereignty; (B) a statement of extraterritoriality; (C) a waiver of sovereign immunity; (D) a submission to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice

Answer:______Explanation:

9.In 1992, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in a case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., that when a substance in food causes injury to a consumer of the food, it is not a bar to recovery against the seller that the substance was natural to the food. If, in a 2008 case involving a consumer's injury caused by a fish bone in a bowl of fish chowder, the court followed the decision in Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the court's action in the second case is an example of (A) stare decisis; (B) judicial review; (C) statutory interpretation; (D) public law.

Answer:______Explanation:

10.Common law is never as easy as we might like because the law is trying to accommodate both (A) intent and reason; (B) flexibility and precedent.; (C) predictability and flexibility; (D) understandability and predictability.

Answer:______Explanation: