9. Linda bought a new Tesla SUV that just came on the market. A year later, the SUV spontaneously caught on fire in her driveway. The SUV was destroyed, but no other property was damaged, and no one was injured. Linda filed a suit in a Los Angeles Superior Court. against Tesla on the theory of strict product liability to recover the cost of the SUV. California limits the application of strict product liability to situations involving personal injuries. Is Lindas claim likely to succeed? Why? Is there another basis for liability on which she might recover? Why?