9. Poor Sarah Jane not only had a short-lived marriage but found out that her supposedly $45,000 ring was worth only half that amount. It seems that the jeweler had misrepresented the value to her now ex-husband. Sarah Jane brings an action against the jeweler for breach of an express warranty. Does she have the ability to sue even though she was not the purchaser? [Schauer v. Mandarin Gems of California, Inc., 125 Cal. Rptr. 4th 949 (2005).]

Please provide detailed answers and references. Thank you!