9-3. Acceptance. Kathy Wright and real estate agent Jen- nifer Crilow orally agreed to a contract with a protection period. Under this provision, if Wright's property sold after the contract expired to a party who had been shown the property during the term of the contract, Crilow would still receive a commission. Crilow sent Wright a written copy of the agreement. Wright crossed out the protection-period provision and then signed and returned the copy. Before the contract expired, Crilow showed Wright's property to Michael Ballway. After the contract expired, Ballway bought the property. Does Wright owe Crilow a commis- sion? Why or why not? [Crilow v. Wright, Ohio App.3d (2011)] (See Acceptance.) 9-1. Acceptance. Lucas Contracting, Inc., is a small con- tractor in Carrollton, Ohio. Altisource Portfolio Solutions, Inc., hired Lucas to work on certain foreclosed properties. When payment for the work was not forthcoming, Lucas filed a suit in an Ohio state court against Altisource. Before the trial, Lucas e-mailed the terms of a settlement. The same day, Altisource e-mailed a response that did not challenge or contradict Lucas's proposal and indicated agreement to it. Two days later, however, Altisource forwarded a settle- ment document that contained additional terms. Which e-mail proposal most likely satisfies the element of agree- ment to establish a contract? Explain. [Lucas Contracting, Inc. v. Altisource Portfolio Solutions, Inc., 2016 WL 529408 (2016)] (See Acceptance.)