a. (10 Points for this Question) - Did the appellate Court uphold the trial Court's award of compensatory damages to the Mathiases and against Accor? If so, (1) explain the purpose of compensatory damages in civil litigation; and (2) citing specific facts from the case excerpt, explain why the appellate Court upheld the award of compensatory damages to the Mathiases (.e., why what Accor did or didn't do that caused the Mathiases damage or loss, legally entitling them to compensation). Or, if not, (1) explain the purpose of compensatory damages in civil litigation; and (2) citing specific facts from the case excerpt, explain why the appellate Court overturned the award of compensatory damages to the Mathiases (i.e., why what Accor did or didn't do either caused the Mathiases no damage or loss or why the Mathiases were not legally entitled to compensation from Accor)