A 12.00 kg mass (mass 'A") is initially travelling East at 4.68 m/s. This moving mass hits an initially stationary 6.00 kg mass (mass 'B'). The collision is a so-called \"\"square-on'" collision (not a \"glancing blow*). This means that ALL motion for both masses travels ONLY within a linear track, along a one-dimensional axis. Assume no air resistance, no friction, and a perfectly elastic collision. (a) What are the final post-collision velocities of the two masses? Show all "Conservation" statements and equations BEFORE you actually use them. Show all equations-development as required. State any assumptions required. (b} Show a 3 step series of fully labelled diagrams showing: (i) before the collision (i) the collision itself (iii) after the collision (c) Describe in words how you think the quantitative results you determined in (a) make sense qualitatively. sowus (d) Relate Newton's 3 Laws to each of the 3 steps in (b). sBonus (e) Assume the above given physical quantities. Include that mass 'A' travels for 1.87 meters before colliding with mass 'B' across a surface that now has a 0.0361 coefficient of kinetic friction. Assume mass 'B' is moving very slightly just before impact. (i) How much energy is lost just prior to the collision? (i} What are the new final velocities, the moment after impact? (i) Which mass will stop moving first in the post-collision time frame? sonus (f) Go back to the no-friction conditions of the original question, but with the following important change: (i) Determine final mass velocity for the original collision conditions IF the collision was instead a perfectly inelastic collision. (ii) How much energy is lost because of this perfectly inelastic collision? Calculate and explain this energy loss. sonus (g) How would all of the above answers change if mass 'A' was 10.00 kg less massive than originally stated, so then in that alternate question, mass 'A' is only 2.00 kg? We assume that mass 'B' is still 6.00 kg and that all the other quantities and conditions stay the same throughout a second pass through the above question and question parts. Get your 'second pass' answers/calculations/quantitative/qualitative/diagrams/etc and present these 'mirror' findings for this question where the impacting mass is 6 times less massive (or, 10 kg less massive) than in the original question and question parts