A adult patient with complete contractual capacity requires heart surgery, signs consent to operate. However, he also signs refusal of treatment with blood products if he needs a blood transfusion. The patient also signs a release from liability. Surgery goes well, but he later ends up with a blood clot and has a stroke rendering him unconscious. He then starts bleeding from his surgery incision site and requires a blood transfusion. His mother is listed as his emergency contact in his chart, she is called and consequently authorizes the use of blood products. The patient is given 2 units of blood and survives. Does he have the right to sue? Does he have a solid case?