a$.$ Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP$-10$ and FP$-20.$ What joint costs would be allocated to FP$-10$ and FP$-20?$

b$.$ There is a possibility that a market for FP$-10$ and FP$-20$ at split$-$off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value $($at split$-$off$)$ would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split$-$off and processing them further?

c$.$ At what sales value $($at split$-$off$)$ would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split$-$off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP$-40$ increases to $$150,000$ for every $55,000$ units of FP$-40$ produced?

Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.

Forest Products, Incorporated, manufactures three products $($FP$-10,$ FP$-20,$ and FP$-40)$ from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $$240,000.$ Additional information follows:

$\backslash$table$[[$Product$,\backslash$table$[[$Units$],[$Produced$]],$Sales Values,$\backslash$table$[[$Processing$],[$Costs $($After$],[$Split$-$Off$)]]],[$FP $-10,66,000,$$$168,000,$$$28,000$