A B C D 1 WorkEnga Leadershi Performance \begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|} \hline & 32 & 32 & 2.830969 \\ \hline 3 & 19 & 79 & -5.32642 \\ \hline 4 & 16 & 44 & 3.068711 \\ \hline 5 & 99 & 81 & 15.8347 \\ \hline 6 & 41 & 78 & -0.53622 \\ \hline 7 & 100 & 57 & 2.705603 \\ \hline 8 & 32 & 90 & -3.48633 \\ \hline 9 & 86 & 33 & -8.59147 \\ \hline 10 & 9 & 75 & -7.12482 \\ \hline 11 & 79 & 50 & -1.13736 \\ \hline 12 & 59 & 49 & -0.51612 \\ \hline 13 & 31 & 17 & 4.874721 \\ \hline 14 & 87 & 30 & -9.47398 \\ \hline 15 & 21 & 86 & -7.19154 \\ \hline 16 & 47 & 83 & 1.898472 \\ \hline 17 & 24 & 2 & 10.58539 \\ \hline 18 & 96 & 55 & 0.918524 \\ \hline 19 & 14 & 74 & -6.03288 \\ \hline 20 & 69 & 46 & -1.73566 \\ \hline 21 & 55 & 92 & 4.758032 \\ \hline 22 & 13 & 16 & 11.64036 \\ \hline 23 & 41 & 58 & 0.4559 \\ \hline 24 & 20 & 85 & -7.04154 \\ \hline 25 & 56 & 37 & -1.48224 \\ \hline 26 & 41 & 84 & 0.183811 \\ \hline 27 & 19 & 22 & 7.815775 \\ \hline 28 & 41 & 26 & 1.590311 \\ \hline 29 & 45 & 33 & 0.52242 \\ \hline 30 & 4 & 23 & 12.47156 \\ \hline 31 & 11 & 67 & -4.11119 \\ \hline 32 & & & \\ \hline & & & \\ \hline & 31 & & \end{tabular} Download the dataset above. It contains 30 employee responses on work engagenent, leadershlp satisfaction, and job performance. Perform a modernted regression analysis in which work engagenent, leadership satisfaction, and their interaction predicts job performance. Use the results of this analysis to answer the questions below. What is the value of the unstandardired beta (g1) associated with woek engagement? Please round to two decimal places. Question 2 What is the t-statistic associated with work engagement? Please round to two decimal places Question 3 Was the effect of work engagement statitically signibcant? What is the value of the unstandardized beta (B2) associated with leadership satislaction? Please round to two decimal places. Question 5 5 pts What is the t-statistic associated with leadership satisfaction? Please round to two decimal plices. Question 6 Was the effect of leadership atisfaction statistically signifcant? A. Wes. It was Mathically verificant becarse the p-value was less than ,05. 11. Yei. Ii wan slatistbally significant becaune the g value was ereater than .05. C. Na. was not statimically venificant becauce the p.4abe was Iens than 05 . D. No, it was pot sativically significant becanse the p-value was geater than of What is the value of the unstandardized beta (B3) associated with the interaction term? Please round to two decimal places. Question 8 What is the t-statistic associated with the interaction tem? Please round to two decimal places. Question 9 Was the effect of the interaction term statistically significant? A Yec it was statistically significant becaine the p-value was less than os. B. Yes. It was statistically significant because the p-value was greater then os C. No. It was not statistically significant because the p-value was less than.05, D. No. It was not statistically significant because the p.value was gieater than 05 What was the overall R2 of the model? Please round to two decimal places. A B C D 1 WorkEnga Leadershi Performance \begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|} \hline & 32 & 32 & 2.830969 \\ \hline 3 & 19 & 79 & -5.32642 \\ \hline 4 & 16 & 44 & 3.068711 \\ \hline 5 & 99 & 81 & 15.8347 \\ \hline 6 & 41 & 78 & -0.53622 \\ \hline 7 & 100 & 57 & 2.705603 \\ \hline 8 & 32 & 90 & -3.48633 \\ \hline 9 & 86 & 33 & -8.59147 \\ \hline 10 & 9 & 75 & -7.12482 \\ \hline 11 & 79 & 50 & -1.13736 \\ \hline 12 & 59 & 49 & -0.51612 \\ \hline 13 & 31 & 17 & 4.874721 \\ \hline 14 & 87 & 30 & -9.47398 \\ \hline 15 & 21 & 86 & -7.19154 \\ \hline 16 & 47 & 83 & 1.898472 \\ \hline 17 & 24 & 2 & 10.58539 \\ \hline 18 & 96 & 55 & 0.918524 \\ \hline 19 & 14 & 74 & -6.03288 \\ \hline 20 & 69 & 46 & -1.73566 \\ \hline 21 & 55 & 92 & 4.758032 \\ \hline 22 & 13 & 16 & 11.64036 \\ \hline 23 & 41 & 58 & 0.4559 \\ \hline 24 & 20 & 85 & -7.04154 \\ \hline 25 & 56 & 37 & -1.48224 \\ \hline 26 & 41 & 84 & 0.183811 \\ \hline 27 & 19 & 22 & 7.815775 \\ \hline 28 & 41 & 26 & 1.590311 \\ \hline 29 & 45 & 33 & 0.52242 \\ \hline 30 & 4 & 23 & 12.47156 \\ \hline 31 & 11 & 67 & -4.11119 \\ \hline 32 & & & \\ \hline & & & \\ \hline & 31 & & \end{tabular} Download the dataset above. It contains 30 employee responses on work engagenent, leadershlp satisfaction, and job performance. Perform a modernted regression analysis in which work engagenent, leadership satisfaction, and their interaction predicts job performance. Use the results of this analysis to answer the questions below. What is the value of the unstandardired beta (g1) associated with woek engagement? Please round to two decimal places. Question 2 What is the t-statistic associated with work engagement? Please round to two decimal places Question 3 Was the effect of work engagement statitically signibcant? What is the value of the unstandardized beta (B2) associated with leadership satislaction? Please round to two decimal places. Question 5 5 pts What is the t-statistic associated with leadership satisfaction? Please round to two decimal plices. Question 6 Was the effect of leadership atisfaction statistically signifcant? A. Wes. It was Mathically verificant becarse the p-value was less than ,05. 11. Yei. Ii wan slatistbally significant becaune the g value was ereater than .05. C. Na. was not statimically venificant becauce the p.4abe was Iens than 05 . D. No, it was pot sativically significant becanse the p-value was geater than of What is the value of the unstandardized beta (B3) associated with the interaction term? Please round to two decimal places. Question 8 What is the t-statistic associated with the interaction tem? Please round to two decimal places. Question 9 Was the effect of the interaction term statistically significant? A Yec it was statistically significant becaine the p-value was less than os. B. Yes. It was statistically significant because the p-value was greater then os C. No. It was not statistically significant because the p-value was less than.05, D. No. It was not statistically significant because the p.value was gieater than 05 What was the overall R2 of the model? Please round to two decimal places