A brief review of the relationship between laissez-faire leadership style and employee performance. Laissez-faire leadership is considered a lack of leadership and/or zero leadership by failing to provide subordinates with information or feedback Yang, I. (2015). The study involved academic members from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa University. Purposive sampling was utilized to select participants, and structured questionnaires were used to collect data. The study found that incorporating a cognitive style indicator improves the association between laissez-faire leadership and employee performance. I chose the article to demonstrate the advantages of (LFL) style. The Laissez-faire Leadership (LFL) style delegated duties to people, did not establish defined goals or methods for attaining them, and did not facilitate decision-making. Laissez-faire leadership lacks leadership, with employees acting in their best interests. They have the freedom to make their own decisions, allowing them to work more creatively, have flexible hours, and avoid rigid schedules, and the laissez-faire leadership style enables them to do so. Describe an insight you gained from reading this post or the analysis of it