A) Briefly describe lines of evidence (at least 3) illustrating the separation between the content of memories and a sense of familiarity or ownership of the memories.

Answer: Multiple lines of evidence can reveal the separation between the content of memories and the sense of familiarity or ownership of the memories. For example, can have familiarity without memory (e.g., in deja vu), can evoke memory or familiarity, separately, during electrical brain stimulation, or can have distorted familiarity involving correct recognition but impaired attribution (e.g., Capgras syndrome).

B) How is this separation understood in terms of the distinction that has been drawn between recollection and familiarity?

Can someone help with question B in response to A?