A building was rented "for use as a saloon" under a 5 year lease. Two years thereafter, the state passed a law making the sale of liquor illegal. Is the renter still obligated to perform under contract law?

A.No, because subsequent illegality frustrated the original terms of the contract.

B.No, because the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies .

C.Yes, because both parties agreed to the terms of the lease.D.

Yes, because a subsequent change in the law does not excuse the parties from performing the contract.