Question
A business which supplied deck railing to the property of the buyer, was unpaid, and so had a employee enter the property where the deck
A business which supplied deck railing to the property of the buyer, was unpaid, and so had a employee enter the property where the deck railing was stacked. It was not yet installed. He took back the deck railing. Assume the Sale of Goods Act, R.S.A. 2000, c-S-2 is applicable. Which implied condition warranty of Section 14 of the Act would support the position of the buyer of the deck railing that the entry on the property and taking of the deck railing was illegal? The one in:
a. Subsection 14(a)(i)
b. Subsection 14(c)
c. Subsection 14(a)(ii)
d. Subsection 14(b)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-text-image.webp)
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Step: 3
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started