A Caucasian guy, perhaps 21 years old, donning a Liberty University baseball hat and t-shirt, commits robbery at a convenience shop. The low-quality security camera footage from the business matches the victim cashier's account. The victim's account remains unaltered by the store's security camera footage.

A police officer from the area saw a car near the convenience shop two days after the heist that had a Liberty University student parking sticker. The student was requested by the police to provide their driver's license after the officer pulled over the car. Both the student's appearance and the clothes he was wearing were reminiscent of the thief. At the time of the incident, the student said that he was shooting "hoops" alone on the campus of Liberty University. The patrol officer freed the motorist after confirming his identity as John Smith. The victim cashier was given a picture array that included an image of John Smith. Smith was identified as the thief by the victim's cashier.

Please answer the following question and explain your reasoning using just the facts of this made-up scenario. You may cite relevant case law in your response, but you must not add any new material to the fact pattern. In your opinion, is there sufficient evidence to justify Smith's arrest? Incorporate a Christian worldview viewpoint to bolster your argument.