A city council passed an ordinance providing: "No person may contribute more than $100 annually to any group organized for the specific purpose of supporting or opposing referenda to be voted on by the city electorate or regularly engaging in such activities." If the ordinance is challenged in federal court, how should the court rule on the constitutionality of this ordinance? Group of answer choices Uphold it, because the city council has a legitimate interest in controlling such contributions. Strike it down as a violation of due process, because no hearing mechanism has been provided for. Strike it down, because it violates First Amendment rights of free speech and freedom of association. Dismiss the case, because it involves a political question and is thus a nonjusticiable matter