A defendant is allowed to file a motion to dismiss a plaintiff's complaint, but which of these
Question:
A defendant is allowed to file a motion to dismiss a plaintiff's complaint, but which of these would not be appropriate to file:
Group of answer choices
the court does not have jurisdiction over the defendant
the plaintiff failed to state a claim for which the law provides a remedy
there was not proper service of the complaint
all of the above choices are possibly appropriate
the court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter
The defendant's reply to the complaint, in which the defendant admits or denies the allegations, is known as:
Group of answer choices
a countercomplaint
a rebuttal
a motion to admit
an answer
If, in response to a plaintiff's assertions, a defendant asserts that the plaintiff owes the defendant money, the defendant has made a:
Group of answer choices
demurrer
counterclaim
affirmative defense
summons
If a defendant answering a complaint admits to the plaintiff's allegations but asserts additional facts that constitute a defense to the complaint, the defendant has asserted:
Group of answer choices
a pleading
an answer
a counterclaim
an affirmative defense
The purpose of the pleadings is to:
Group of answer choices
notify each of the parties of the claims and defenses of each other
none of the other choices are correct
limit the evidence to the agreed upon items
determine if a jury will be used
The discovery state in the trial process is intended for the:
Group of answer choices
parties to obtain information about the facts before the trial starts
judge to have a chance to review the arguments before they make them before the jury
parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the judge, who discovers the truth
parties to have time to present their sides of the case to the jury, so it can discover the truth
According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party seeking information must use a discovery tool that:
Group of answer choices
the other party approves of before hand
imposes significant burdens on the other party
is not "unduly burdensome" to the other party
the bailiff approves of
Depositions:
Group of answer choices
may only be taken once trial has commenced
are taken before trial, during discovery, but may not be taken from the defendant herself
are taken before trial or during trial
are taken before trial, during discovery
If the testimony of an expert witness is critical to a case being made, but the judge rejects the expert testimony as not credible, then, according to the Supreme Court:
Group of answer choices
the case may be ended by summary judgment
there will be a new trial with a different witness
there will be a new trial if the defendant, not the plaintiff, wishes to have one with or without new experts
there will be a new trial with the witness allowed to present corrected evidence
Which of the following in not true about expert witnesses and their testimony:
Group of answer choices
the testimony may not be contrary to prevailing scientific opinion
the experts may not be questioned by the opposition before trial
when experts conflict, the testimony of both sides will be stricken
if the evidence is not credible it will be rejected by the court