A defendant was charged under the Federal Kidnapping Act when he kidnapped his ex-girlfriend and took her across state lines, holding her against her will for five days until she was reported missing and finally found. During the defendant's federal trial, the ex-girlfriend rebuts his assertion that she voluntarily accompanied him by stating that she inflicted severe gashes on his body with her fingernails during her attempts to escape, and that the defendant had to be treated by a physician to prevent infection. The defendant denies seeking treatment for any such injuries. The prosecution calls a physician, who will testify that he treated the defendant's wounds the day after the kidnapping took place. The defendant's attorney objects. The jurisdiction's physician-patient privilege applies to both civil and criminal proceedings. How should the court rule on the admissibility of the physician's testimony? Group of answer choices Admissible, because the physician-patient privilege does not apply. Inadmissible, because it violates the physician-patient privilege. Inadmissible, because it violates the privilege against self-incrimination. Admissible, as a declaration of past bodily condition