A defendant was indicted for arson. The prosecution called the defendant's neighbor to testify about a conversation he had with the defendant one week before trial in which the defendant admitted to committing the arson. On cross-examination, the defendant's attorney asked the neighbor if, on the day before the trial, the neighbor told a friend that he had never had a conversation with the defendant in which the defendant admitted committing the arson. Upon objection, how should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of the question to the neighbor? Group of answer choices Admissible to prove that the defendant did not commit the arson. Admissible to impeach the neighbor's credibility. Inadmissible because it is hearsay not within an exception. Inadmissible unless the neighbor's friend is ready to testify about the conversation