A developer buys several undeveloped parcels of land on a beach front. At a later date, the state passes a law greatly restricting coastal development. When the developers request for permission to develop is denied, he sues for compensation under the Fifth Amendment $($See Palazollo v Rhode Island $(2001)).$ a$.$ How would you decide on this case? What other cases would you cite? b$.$ Would it matter whether the plaintiff had bought the land after enactment of the statute restricting development $?$