a. Elly advertised her company's product on Facebook which read: "My company has successfully developed 'Slim Pill' that can slim down a woman's body if taken every day for two weeks. My company gives assurance that it is very effective. If it is not effective, my company will pay a compensation of RM1,500. To strengthen the guarantee, my company has deposited RM15,000 with ZEMB Bank. " Amy, who read the advertisement, bought the pill and took it according to the instructions. However, two weeks later Amy's weight increased. Accordingly, Amy demanded the RM1,500 compensation as promised. However, Elly's company refused to pay the compensation on the ground that the advertisement was just a marketing gimmick. Based on the facts above, determine whether Amy is entitled to claim the RM1,500 compensation. Support your answer with one (1) statutory provision and one (1) case authority relating to the law of contract. b. On December 2, 2021, Raymond offered to sell his Proton X70 car to Lee for RM80,000. When Lee said that he was interested but needed time to think about it, Raymond agreed to EPPA2823 3 give Lee a little bit of time to make a decision. On May 31, 2022, Lee informed Raymond that he wanted to buy the car as offered by the latter. However, Raymond replied that the car had been sold to someone else. Lee, who is furious, wants to sue Raymond for breach of contract. If Lee pursues his intention, will he succeed? Support your answer with one (1) statutory provision and one (1) case authority relating to the law of contract