A federal grand jury was investigating "john Doe," president and sole shareholder of "XYZ" corporation, concerning possible violations of federal securities and money-laundering statutes. During the investigation, the governmentlearned that XYZ had paid he billsfor varioustelephone lines, including those used in Doe's homes and car. Grand jury subpoenas caling for the production of documents were then served on the custodian of XYZ's corporate records, on Doe, and on the law firm Paul, Weiss Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (Paul-Weiss), which represented Doe. These subpoenas sought production of telephone bills, records, and statements of accountregarding certain telephone numbers, including those used by Doe. the district court determined after an evidentiary hearing that the documents sought were XYZ's, and not Doe's.

please help me respond to this with three paragraphs, its much needed help. take whatever time, thanks. paragraph is counted as 3 full sentences or more.

Each response will be graded according to the following rubric:

Is the answer correct as it discusses the relevant law?

complete analysis, including alternate scenarios, additional thoughts, and direct correlation between the answer and the question?

well organized?

enough content to demonstrate understanding of the topic?

spelling and grammar, and have good sentence structure?