A French company manufacturing critical tail assemblies for commercial aircraft ships several defective assemblies to manufacturers in the United States. The CEO, a French national, was not only aware of the defects at the time the assemblies were being made but was also responsible for knowingly using inferior parts. He even threatened an to fire an engineer if he leaked the information of knowing. One of the assemblies failed on the American-made plane, leading to the crash of a takeoff from New York. When the investigation leads to him, he for Saudi Arabia, where he lives for several years in luxury.

Which countries have jurisdiction in this case to prosecute the CEO, and under what legal principles?