A has two Corvette Stingray automobiles, one built in 1965 and the other built in 2009. Both cars are worth approximately the same amount (about $70 000.00). A now wants to sell the 1965 Corvette and to this end begins negotiations with B, who knows that A owns both a 1965 and a 2009 Corvette. In discussions with B, A says "I'm thinking of selling my Corvette for $65 000.00." B believes A is talking about his 2009 Corvette, so B says, "I'll buy it at that price," and pays A the $65 000.00. Later A calls B asking him when he is going to pick up the 1965 Corvette. Having thought that he was buying the 2009 Corvette, B now tells A he wants his money back. Is this enough to void the contract? Why or why not? What remedies will the court impose if the contract is void?