A hypothetical case: Suppose that the states of Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico, and the USA are parties to a multilateral treaty banning trade barriers on all dairy products. The state of Brazil informs the other five states that it does not consider itself bound by the provision of the treaty regarding the compulsory settlement of treaty-related disputes by the International Court of Justice. (HINT: The statement by Brazil is a "Reservation" with relevant Articles on the subject in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT)). The states of Argentina, Canada, and Chile do not respond to the statement. The state of Mexico agrees with the statement. The state of the USA objects to the statement. The treaty does not mention anything about reservations. Discuss the legal effects of the statement made by the state of Brazil. (Hint: Refer to the relevant articles of the VCLT and ICJ rulings in cases of reservation in explaining what the law prescribes. Discuss the legal effects of the reactions by the other five states to the statement made by Brazil