A man carrying a package jumped aboard a car of a moving train. It was a package of small size,covered by a newspaper, and contained fireworks, but there was nothing in its appearance to givenotice of its contents. A guard on the car reached forward to help the man in, and another guardon the platform pushed him from behind. In this act, the package was dislodged, and fell uponthe rails exploded, causing injuries to plaintiff, an intending passenger, who stood on theplatform many feet away. The shock of the explosion threw down some scales at the other end ofthe platform, which struck the plaintiff, causing injuries for which she sues.

In the Palsgraf case, the question addressed by the court regarding the issue of foreseeability was:

a.Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that the scales would fall?

b.Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that someone in the train station would be carrying explosive fireworks?

c.Was it foreseeable to the railroad employee helping the passenger onto the train that doing so might lead to injury to Ms. Palsgraf or another bystander?

d.Was it foreseeable to the passenger carrying the fireworks that they might explode and injure someone?