Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

A marketing firm evaluates all job candidates for account executive positions on the basis of the candidates' job history and previous experience, their scores on

image text in transcribed
A marketing firm evaluates all job candidates for account executive positions on the basis of the candidates' job history and previous experience, their scores on a general mental ability test, and interviews with managers familiar with the job requirements. Mike Peltan, a candidate who was rejected for the job, expressed his doubt and bitterness about the selection process: "I can understand their looking at my job history. I can understand their interviewing me to get a sense of how I would perform on the job. But that so-called mental ability test is just ridiculous. It had questions about number sequences, putting words in the right order, and judging which polygon was most different from the others. I can guarantee you that the job I applied for would never require me to judge polygons or re-scramble words to make a sentence. It's a marketing job. You'd think that the company would have enough sense to judge on marketing skills rather than on some irrelevant academic skills." Which of the following statements is the most accurate response to Mike Peltan's complaint? The mental ability test may have low face validity, but is likely to have good predictive validity for the marketing job, based on much prior research in HRM. All of the following answers are correct: The mental ability test is likely to have low predictive validity for the marketing job, because it has low face validity and low content validity. The mental ability test has low construct validity, because general mental ability has been shown to be a myth. The marketing firm should be advised to stop using the general mental ability test. because courts have ruled them illegal for their low reliability and low face construct, and predictive validity. The mental ability test has low construct validity, because general mental ability has been shown to be a myth. The marketing firm should be advised to stop using the general mental ability test, because courts have ruled them illegal for their low reliability and low face construct, and predictive validity. The mental ability test is likely to have low predictive validity for the marketing job, because it has low face validity and law.contentavad A marketing firm evaluates all job candidates for account executive positions on the basis of the candidates' job history and previous experience, their scores on a general mental ability test, and interviews with managers familiar with the job requirements. Mike Peltan, a candidate who was rejected for the job, expressed his doubt and bitterness about the selection process: "I can understand their looking at my job history. I can understand their interviewing me to get a sense of how I would perform on the job. But that so-called mental ability test is just ridiculous. It had questions about number sequences, putting words in the right order, and judging which polygon was most different from the others. I can guarantee you that the job I applied for would never require me to judge polygons or re-scramble words to make a sentence. It's a marketing job. You'd think that the company would have enough sense to judge on marketing skills rather than on some irrelevant academic skills." Which of the following statements is the most accurate response to Mike Peltan's complaint? The mental ability test may have low face validity, but is likely to have good predictive validity for the marketing job, based on much prior research in HRM. All of the following answers are correct: The mental ability test is likely to have low predictive validity for the marketing job, because it has low face validity and low content validity. The mental ability test has low construct validity, because general mental ability has been shown to be a myth. The marketing firm should be advised to stop using the general mental ability test. because courts have ruled them illegal for their low reliability and low face construct, and predictive validity. The mental ability test has low construct validity, because general mental ability has been shown to be a myth. The marketing firm should be advised to stop using the general mental ability test, because courts have ruled them illegal for their low reliability and low face construct, and predictive validity. The mental ability test is likely to have low predictive validity for the marketing job, because it has low face validity and law.contentavad

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

College Accounting Chapters 1-26

Authors: Douglas J. McQuaig, Patricia A. Bille

6th Edition

0395796997, 978-0395796993

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions