a) Matthew would be alleged to be inadmissible by the CBSA officer, who would initiate an inadmissibility report based on Matthew's conviction in the United States and direct that a hearing be held at the Immigration Division. b) Because Matthew is inadmissible to Canada, the CBSA officer would revoke his permanent resident status at the border. Subsequently, Matthew would be deported back to the United States. c) Matthew would not be found to be inadmissible, because he has already served his jail sentence in the United States. Therefore, the CBSA officer cannot have him