A new neighbor is stopping by another neighbor's home and gets attacked by the homeowners dog. The new neighbor sue the homeowners for negligence. The homeowner argues that the new neighbor saw but ignored a \"Beware of Dog" sign posted outside the home: therefore, the homeowner is not liable. What is the homeowner's defense? Lack of damages Assumption of risk Lack of proximate cause Negligence per se An individual walks into a store, slips, and falls on the oor. The individual is iniured and sues the store claiming negligence. The store manager argues that several signs warning customers about the wet oors were posted, so the store should not be held liable. Which element is unfullled, according to the store? Actual cause Proximate cause Breach of duty Damages A homeowner has an unfenced pool in the backyard. A neighbor's child trespasses onto the homeowner's property, used the pool without permission, and is injured. The neighbor sues the homeowner for negligence. Which tact creates the most significant level of liability for the homeowner? The trespasser was not an invitee The trespasser was a child The homeowner had not cleaned the pool recently The homeowner has no responsibility for the child