A party planner contracted to rent a rooftop patio from a vendor for a festival party. The party planner rented the patio based on the belief that the planner's clients would be able to see the city's fireworks display from the patio. In order to ensure that the patio would be safe, the vendor visited the building upon which the patio was to be placed, took measurements, and inspected the condition of the roof. However, a week before the party, the building was destroyed in a fire.

Which of the following arguments can the party planner successfully use to refuse to pay for the patio?

Group of answer choices

It is impossible to use the patio to see the fireworks.

It is impracticable to use the patio to see the fireworks.

The parties made a mutual mistake about the continued existence of the building.

The purpose of renting the patio has been frustrated by the destruction of the building.