A person giving advice can be liable for negligence not only to a person they directly advise but also to third parties. Which of the following is not a requirement to establish a duty of care in this situation:

Group of answer choices

The person giving advice knew or should have known that the advice would be communicated to the third-party individually or as a member of an identified class.

The person giving advice knew or should have known that the advice would be so communicated for a purpose that would be very likely to lead the third party to enter a transaction of the kind entered by them.

The person giving advice knew or should have known that it would be very likely the third party would enter such a transaction in reliance on the advice and risk incurring a loss if the advice is wrong or unsound.

The person giving the advice communicated with the third party in relation to the advice.