A plaintiff sues a defendant in a Texas federal court for copyright violation for using one of the plaintiff's songs in ads marketing the defendant's cattle prods. The ads were on local television and radio stations throughout Texas on a regular basis and were very successful. The defendant is located in California. The defendant files a motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The defendant claims that it is a resident of California and all decisions regarding the song were made in California, so any claims against it regarding the song must be filed in California. The court denied the motion. Was the court correct? Question 10 options: a) Yes, because the defendant likely failed to satisfy its burden in making the motion. b) Yes, because proper venue is based on the defendant's residence. c) No, because a substantial portion of the events occurred in California. d) No, because the defendant chose to advertise in the state of Texas